Brian Bonner discusses the perilous state of Russia's war with Minnesota Public Radio
The interview took place in late November.
A central street covered in debris from destroyed residential buildings after Russian bombing in Kurakhove, a city in Ukraineβs eastern Donetsk Oblast, on Nov. 7.
Anton Shtuka | AP
Here is a link to the audio of the interview.
The war in Ukraine has lasted more than 1,000 days β and both sides are shifting tactics.
The U.S. and Europe both bolstered support for Ukraineβs arsenal, and Russia made serious threats of nuclear attack. Plus, American-made missiles struck Russian soil for the first time since the war began.
For an update, MPR News host Nina Moini spoke with Brian Bonner, a journalist formerly with the St. Paul Pioneer Press and former editor of the Kyiv Post, Ukraineβs premier English-language newspaper.
Use the audio player above to listen to the full conversation.
Subscribe to the Minnesota Now podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
We attempt to make transcripts for Minnesota Now available the next business day after a broadcast. When ready they will appear here.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
Audio Transcript
NINA MOINI: Now, more than 1,000 days into the war in Ukraine, significant shifts in tactics are happening. The US and Europe both bolstered support for Ukraine's arsenal, and Russia made serious threats of a nuclear attack. Plus, American-made missiles struck Russian soil for the first time since the war began.
We want an update on these big changes from our friend Brian Bonner in Kyiv. Brian is a journalist formerly with the St. Paul Pioneer Press and the former editor of the Kyiv Post, Ukraine's Premier English-language newspaper. Thank you so much for joining us, Brian.
BRIAN BONNER: Nina, thanks for having me.
NINA MOINI: And this is, I think, our first time speaking, but we know you've been a great friend to the show throughout your journey there, and we appreciate it. How are you doing right now?
BRIAN BONNER: Well, I'm always happy to. Minnesota is still a big part of my life, even though I live in Ukraine. Well, if we're under another air raid alert on cue, that's very common. Last night was very loud and noisy.
I'm used to waking up in the middle of the night because that's when the Russians usually attack. It was very loud. It was like machine gun fire trying to knock out Iranian Shahed drones. Before that happened, I was listening to YouTube highlights of Minnesota and Chicago; that's how crazy I became. I was annoyed that I had to get out of bed and listen to this.
But we've all gone a little bit crazy. That's my personal view. The larger view is that Ukraine is facing a very difficult situation on the battlefront and a very uncertain situation as Donald Trump takes over.
NINA MOINI: 1,000 days; I mean, it's really hard to imagine what you all have been through. Just last week, the Biden administration said it would draw down more than $7 billion in military equipment and ammunition from stockpiles to send to Ukraine before President-elect Trump takes office. What do you make of that, trying to get the resources they can before the unknown occurs?
BRIAN BONNER: Well, it's too late. The Biden administration had the chance to change the dynamics very early on. They knew the invasion was coming. And Bob Woodward's recent book, War, lays out what all Ukrainians and people who live in Ukraine know. Well, deterrence failed, and preparation failed. I mean, the latest example, finally, two months before he leaves office, he's removed the restrictions on using long-range weapons to strike Russian military targets deep inside Russia. It's just too late. The problem is that the Biden administration allowed itself to be deterred by Vladimir Putin's nuclear threats, which I think are hollow, and also told Putin what he was going to do and what he wasn't going to do.
As you know, we have a long history of not approving this weapons system. Six months later, they approve it, and then it comes slowly. So this is why it might sound illogical: Trump has said, βI want to get this war over with. A lot of people around him say I don't care what happens to Ukraine,β including JD Vance. The hope here is to try something new. The Biden administration's approach is just bleeding Ukraine out; that's the feeling. Now, we could get a lot worse under Trump. But the hope is that Trump understands deterrence, understands that the only way for Putin to negotiate a reasonable deal is if he feels that he's going to lose, and right now Putin does not feel like he's losing. And that means opening up a lot more resources and a lot more weapons than Ukraine has available to it now.
NINA MOINI: It's hard to hear you say it's too late. That must be pretty demoralizing. We know that President-elect Trump has criticized the amount of aid that the US has sent to Ukraine even before they bolstered it just now, and he wants to end the war immediately. He hasn't given details on how that would happen. What are you hearing in Kyiv in response to President-elect Trump's claim?
BRIAN BONNER: If you look at Trump's advisors, they are divided. There are a lot of people who want to cut Ukraine loose. I don't think that's going to happen. I hope not. Here's why. For Ukraine to lose would mean a victory of the autocracies. We are really in a World War III situation here without exaggeration. And many people are saying that who are close to the situation, why? Russia has the help of China, has the help of Iran has the help of North Koreaβs rocket man. Today, in the news, they're recruiting Yemeni soldiers. It's not over the territory of Ukraine. It's over what the rules of the game are. And if Ukraine loses, Ukraine had nuclear weapons and gave them up in exchange for security assurances, then bad consequences are going to happen to the democratic world, the Western world, and any rules-based order. First of all, there's going to be more nations wanting nuclear weapons as deterrence. There will be a lot of costs because NATO allies who are close to Russia understand that they're next or fear that they're next.
So when I say too little, too late, I mean, there was a time when the war could have been prevented. People believed the full-scale invasion. And then, after that, there was a time in 2022 when Ukraine was on the offensive when it could have had it. It's not too late for Ukraine to win, but three years into the war, they're outmanned, and they need to fix that themselves. They are outgunned, and the West needs to do its part. Ukraine also needs to do better in that area. They're just outnumbered, and Russia has vast resources. The good news is, with all Russia's resources, they still haven't managed to take much more of Ukraine than they had three years ago.
NINA MOINI: I'm curious, Brian, you're talking about more serious threats about nuclear warfare. And I'm curious, at this stage, 1,000 days into the war, can you tell us a little bit about what you see out your window, what you're moving through throughout the day, like the level of destruction and if you ever think about maybe leaving Ukraine?
BRIAN BONNER: Well, sadly, if he doesn't win militarily, Vladimir Putin is winning one by one. Now, 7 million people have left the country, and almost every day, I hear from a friend or a friend of a friend who has either left the country or decided not to come back. I want you to know that the heavy fighting and the heavy bombing are occurring in parts of the country that are not as well protected as the capital. So generally, we feel, OK. I mean, the risk is still low. Yes, they keep trying to attack the capital, but they donβt succeed very well. And part of that move is just intimidation. I think what Ukrainians are trying to do with Trump is to show them that Ukraine is not a victim, not a basket case, and that there are resources that won't cost taxpayers a lot of money.
$330 billion in frozen Russian assets could go to Ukraine. There are lend-lease programs, and many people have advocated for a huge sum of $500 billion. In exchange, Ukraine gives up mineral leases or makes economic concessions so taxpayers aren't on the hook. Everybody understands that the world is tired of the war. Nobody is more tired of the war and wants peace more than Ukrainians.
And that does need to happen next year, or else. I'm really worried about the demographic situation. I mean, there's still a good scenario to make Putin understand militarily that he's not going to win, that he's not going to outspend the West. But for that to happen, Ukraine is going to have to get a lot more troops to the front, and they aren't doing that. They're going to have to have a lot more weapons and financial backing. They don't have the weapons of war or the money right now to do that, but it's there.
NINA MOINI: Brian, I want to leave on this note as someone who is living in Ukraine and I've talked to my Ukrainian friends here as well, and I can't imagine what it feels like over there. But do you feel like folks around the world or in the US are not paying as much attention anymore? And what would you tell people about how important continued support is, not just from the federal government but from everyday people, Minnesotans?
BRIAN BONNER: Well, I think there's moral clarity here regarding right and wrong. Ukraine wants to be left alone. It did want to join the European community; it wanted to join the democratic community and gave up its nuclear weapons to do that. They're not a perfect nation. There's still corruption. There are still a lot of problems in their military. They need to draft more soldiers.
But they're the victims here. I mean, they're in the right, and they deserve that. The message is, listen if you don't care about Ukraine. I mean, if Ukraine falls, I don't think it will. But if Ukraine falls, it's just going to cost a lot moreβin defense, in the credibility of the West, and in our ability to deter the axis of instability or whatever you want to call them. China has designs on Taiwan, Iran's menacing behavior, and North Korea's rocket man. I mean, because you're going to see South Korea saying it needs to get a weapon and/or Taiwan or other countries. And I think if we go down this road, we have to show that the West is strong enough to prevail, which means we will get some guarantee.
If you read the polls, Ukrainians are willing to negotiate some territory in exchange for strong security guarantees. The guarantees have to be strong. NATO, we're going to back you up, arm you for decades to come, and help you ever be attacked again. Those guarantees have never been forthcoming.
There are ways to end this, but I don't think Vladimir Putin wants to, basically, by design. He doesn't believe Ukraine is an independent nation. And until he changes his view on that, I doubt any negotiations will be successful under Trump or any administration.
NINA MOINI: Brian, thank you so much for your time. We wish you all the best and hope you'll come back sometime soon.
BRIAN BONNER: Happy to be on the show. Thank you, Nina.
NINA MOINI: Thank you. That was Brian Bonner, a former journalist for the St. Paul Pioneer Press and the former editor of the Kyiv Post, Ukraine's Premier English-language newspaper.
The resilience of the Ukrainian people and the support from over 30 countries worldwide is astonishing, but notice a few things about Killer Putin and his lackeys. The Russian ruble is now worth far less than a penny. Russian manufacturing is virtually non-existent. Putin has refused to institute a draft in historic Muscovy (principally Moscow and St. Petersburg and surroundings), because people in historical Russia only know what the rigidly controlled official press tells them. Conscription consists of paying off convicts to fight on the front lines; many who survive go on to commit further crimes.
In the Donbas, Russia is losing over 1,000 'soldiers' every day. Materiel loss is gigantic and Russia doesn't have the funds or capability to fix destroyed tanks and airplanes, depending instead on drones and cruise missiles from client states like Iran.
Poland's very long border with Russia and Russia's client state of Belarus is now heavily fortified, an increasing number of European and Scandinavian countries have followed suit and increased production of armaments.
The historical neutrality of Sweden is no more and together with Finland, they have both joined NATO, making it stronger than ever.
The Russian front lines in the Donbas region is largely manned by Tuvans, Buryats, Tatars and other non-Russian people from oblasts (states in the Federation) in the Urals and Siberia.
I could go on but there's no really need to do so. Putin is aware that the Russian economy is teetering on the edge of collapse. Ukraine can win this war and destroy Russian militarily. This ancient state is morally sound and extremely determined. It deserves the support of all free peoples.
If you feel like 1,000 days of continual bombardment and loss of life is comedy, then there's something really wrong with you. If you're actually a human, that is, and not just another Russian bot.